<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geoff Holden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geoffholden.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geoffholden.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Fat Client is Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffholden.com/2008/04/07/the-fat-client-is-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geoffholden.com/2008/04/07/the-fat-client-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geoffholden.com/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p id="iytz">I don&#8217;t think anyone will argue against the point that a lot of applications that were traditionally desktop-based are now moving on to the web. Google has proved that you can make very rich, very responsive, and very good web applications; GMail, Google Maps, Calendar, Docs &#38; Spreadsheets, Reader, etc. are all applications I use regularly. While some of them may not have all the features of their fat counterparts, the fact they they work anywhere with a &#8216;net [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="iytz">I don&#8217;t think anyone will argue against the point that a lot of applications that were traditionally desktop-based are now moving on to the web. Google has proved that you can make very rich, very responsive, and very good web applications; GMail, Google Maps, Calendar, Docs &amp; Spreadsheets, Reader, etc. are all applications I use regularly. While some of them may not have all the features of their fat counterparts, the fact they they work anywhere with a &#8216;net connection and a browser makes up for it (for certain uses).</p>
<p id="zyq2">I am a firm believer that the fat client is dead, or at least dying. We are switching to an online world and the OS is being replaced by the browser. It&#8217;s really just a matter of bandwidth and latency before almost every application will move online. Things dealing with really large input can&#8217;t currently work well online but that&#8217;s just a matter of time. Serious photo editing applications for instance, would need a lot of bandwidth; every time I press the shutter on my camera I make a 10MB RAW file, and it&#8217;s not uncommon to have at around 100 photos in a shoot&#8211;uploading a gigabyte of photos to process and sort through right now isn&#8217;t feasible but with more bandwidth it would be. I think that in the next several years we might see Internet access regulated like telephone service is now, and anyone who wants a high speed connection will be able to get one&#8211;and pretty much anybody with a computer will.</p>
<p id="v1t0">Mobile phone applications are also going more web-based. Apple seems to be ahead of the curve on this one, as a lot of things for the iPhone are web applications. Some people would say that it&#8217;s too early to make that jump, as web access on the cellular networks currently isn&#8217;t very good (EDGE is too slow), but this is also what they said when Apple stopped shipping computers with floppy drives and when they switched everything to USB, etc. and those really worked out in their favour.</p>
<p id="ps6t">It&#8217;s also getting much easier to build good web applications. Things like Ruby on Rails and Google Web Toolkit are providing developers with the groundwork they need to really hit the ground running here. I built a full web app using Rails in about a month&#8211;which also included the time to learn Rails, making mistakes, doing things inefficiently, going back and fixing them, etc. I&#8217;ve also worked with Apache Struts in the past, and this application would have taken at least 2-3x the time to implement using Struts. I don&#8217;t have any real first hand experience with GWT yet (I intend to remedy that soon), but from what I&#8217;ve heard and read it really helps make something with the feel of a desktop application.</p>
<p id="qmz_">One of the biggest issues with web applications has been that they go away when the network does: on a plane, during an outage, etc. Google once again came in here with a solution&#8211;Google Gears, which lets these web apps store some data locally and let you use them offline. I haven&#8217;t seen anything really interesting using it except for Google Reader (which was the first public use of it) and now Google Docs, but I keep hearing (unconfirmed) rumours that we&#8217;ll see it integrated into GMail soon.</p>
<p id="qmz_">The other big issue that&#8217;s always brought up is data privacy. I don&#8217;t believe that this is quite as big of an issue as people think it is, as all the companies providing these services have everything to lose and nothing to gain by snooping in on your data or selling it. They&#8217;re equally as concerned with data leaks; Google gets a lot of flack about the amount of data they have, but I know that they take data privacy very seriously&#8211;a lot of effort goes in to keeping everyone&#8217;s data secure. Nevertheless, there will be institutions that will never trust their data in anybody else&#8217;s hands&#8211;I think that the providers will sell a &#8220;black box&#8221; to these places so that they can run their own internal-only instance and keep their data on site, much like Google does with their search appliance now.<br id="y1cy" /></p>
<p id="ax3_">I think it&#8217;s a very dangerous proposition for an new development to not consider a web UI. Personally, I think a lot of effort is currently being wasted on fat clients in companies around the world. Eventually the writing on the wall be become evident and most of that effort will be tossed out in favour of a web UI in the coming couple of years (again, not for every application, but for a lot of them). The argument to this is often that certain things are hard to do on the web, but with the current suite of tools out there it&#8217;s usually not as hard as it might seem, and if it <em id="qhn1">is</em> hard, getting it done could be a competitive advantage. Switching to primarily web-based applications can also reduce a company&#8217;s IT costs; managing application installs on workstations is dirty work, by moving to web-based applications much of this work can be eliminated.<br id="mi20" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffholden.com/2008/04/07/the-fat-client-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backups</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffholden.com/2008/03/30/backups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geoffholden.com/2008/03/30/backups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 01:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geoffholden.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter what I say here, because nobody starts making regular backups until after they lose something important.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the dirty little secret of computer professionals, everyone agrees that backups are a good idea, but nobody actually does them until it&#8217;s too late. The few people who make regular backups rarely, if ever, test them&#8211;which means they may be in for a rude awaking when a drive does die. And drives do die&#8211;I&#8217;ve seen my own ones go bad, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter what I say here, because nobody starts making regular backups until after they lose something important.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the dirty little secret of computer professionals, everyone agrees that backups are a good idea, but nobody actually does them until it&#8217;s too late. The few people who make regular backups rarely, if ever, test them&#8211;which means they may be in for a rude awaking when a drive does die. And drives <em>do</em> die&#8211;I&#8217;ve seen my own ones go bad, and once you get into a larger installation, you see them die every day. They say that a hard drive only exists in two states: failed and about to fail, and this is probably the best way to think about them.</p>
<p>I take my backups seriously, mostly because I take my data seriously. Note that by &#8216;data&#8217; here I don&#8217;t mean every file on my computer, applications, anything downloaded from the &#8216;net, etc. doesn&#8217;t count because it&#8217;s all replaceable. Things like written documents, code, and photographs are not so replaceable and should be backed up.</p>
<p>For me, a good backup system needs to be the following things:</p>
<ul>
<li>Automatic and hands-off &#8212; if you have to do it, you won&#8217;t (generally). This is something that should be as automated as possible&#8211;down to a single script, or fully automatic if possible.</li>
<li>Not locked in to a particular vendor &#8212; you should be able to recover your files anywhere, on any computer.</li>
<li>Reliable &#8212; if it&#8217;s automatic, you shouldn&#8217;t have to check on it to make sure it&#8217;s still working. The media that the backup is stored on should also be something you can rely on (ie, not a CD/DVD that will be unreadable in a few years, or a single hard drive that will fail on you)</li>
<li>Easy to recover from &#8212; it doesn&#8217;t matter if it&#8217;s a single file or all your files, it should be really easy to go back and get those files.</li>
</ul>
<p>So, how do I do my backups? Well, every one of my photos is on (at least) two hard drives and on two DVDs (one at home, the other at work&#8230; in case of fire, theft, etc.). Every photo is copied to my laptop from the camera and then is copied to my server onto a set of mirrored drives. Once I get to around 4GB or so (or enough time has passed that I&#8217;m uncomfortable without the off-site backup) I burn it to two DVDs, put one in the case here and take the other to work. Then eventually the copy on the laptop will get rotated off to make room for more. So at the weakest point the files are on three hard drives (one in the laptop and the mirrored set).</p>
<p>My other files have a slightly different backup scheme. The drives in my desktop and server are all rsync&#8217;d to a different pair of mirrored drives attached to a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSLU2" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSLU2');">Linksys NSLU2</a> running Linux. This is completely automated and happens every night while I sleep, there&#8217;s no human intervention required at all. This one I&#8217;ve had to fall back on once, not because of a drive failure but because of human error. The benefit to the rsync backup scheme is that it&#8217;s done incrementally, so I have snapshot of the drives as they existed for the last week. Because of the way the backup is done, this only takes up the space of the most recent backup, but the differences to the previous ones&#8211;this is far more economical than having 7x your main storage as backup space.</p>
<p>As I said when this started, none of this really matters because everyone thinks they&#8217;re invulnerable to data loss until it happens to them&#8211;but perhaps this will inspire somebody to start anyways. And if you don&#8217;t start making good backups, I&#8217;ll be here to say &#8216;told you so&#8217; when your drives die on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffholden.com/2008/03/30/backups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Site Launch</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffholden.com/2008/02/13/new-site-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geoffholden.com/2008/02/13/new-site-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Site Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.geoffholden.com/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As of tonight, I&#8217;ve launched another blog&#8211;given that I don&#8217;t update this one often enough, having two can only make the problem better, right? The new blog is a photo blog, called <a href="http://gkhphoto.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/');">&#8216;GKH Photography&#8217;</a> and is located at <a href="http://gkhphoto.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/');">gkhphoto.com</a>. The idea is that all my photography will happen there, leaving this site for mostly words about stuff (there may be a photo or two included with a post every now and then, but they will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of tonight, I&#8217;ve launched another blog&#8211;given that I don&#8217;t update this one often enough, having two can only make the problem better, right? The new blog is a photo blog, called <a href="http://gkhphoto.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/');">&#8216;GKH Photography&#8217;</a> and is located at <a href="http://gkhphoto.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/');">gkhphoto.com</a>. The idea is that all my photography will happen there, leaving this site for mostly words about stuff (there may be a photo or two included with a post every now and then, but they will be to support the words, not replace them).</p>
<p>Head over to the new site and take a look, hopefully it&#8217;ll be somewhere you visit regularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffholden.com/2008/02/13/new-site-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christmas Tree</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/12/17/christmas-tree/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/12/17/christmas-tree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.geoffholden.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a quick photo of the Christmas tree I have in my apartment this year. It&#8217;s also the first real use of my cross-screen filter (for the little star bursts around the lights).</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2329569731/Christmas+Tree.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2329569731/Christmas+Tree.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2249/2329569731_04b75d27a8.jpg" alt="Christmas Tree" /></a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a quick photo of the Christmas tree I have in my apartment this year. It&#8217;s also the first real use of my cross-screen filter (for the little star bursts around the lights).</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2329569731/Christmas+Tree.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2329569731/Christmas+Tree.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2249/2329569731_04b75d27a8.jpg" alt="Christmas Tree" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/12/17/christmas-tree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chess Pieces</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/12/06/chess-pieces/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/12/06/chess-pieces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.geoffholden.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just a random image to keep this page from becoming too stagnant.</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2265463146/Ready+for+Battle.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2265463146/Ready+for+Battle.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2041/2265463146_980324b9f5.jpg" alt="Ready for Battle" /></a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a random image to keep this page from becoming too stagnant.</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2265463146/Ready+for+Battle.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2265463146/Ready+for+Battle.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2041/2265463146_980324b9f5.jpg" alt="Ready for Battle" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/12/06/chess-pieces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the Dark</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/11/19/in-the-dark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/11/19/in-the-dark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.geoffholden.com/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here is a photo I took late last night that I wanted to share. It&#8217;s the living room in my apartment lit only by standby LEDs, power LEDs, and my persistence of vision clock. When I took the photo, all you could see with the naked eye were the lights, but given that this was a 4 minute exposure, the camera captured enough light to see the whole room.</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2330372480/Apartment+in+the+Dark.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2330372480/Apartment+in+the+Dark.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2253/2330372480_8b7c918f08.jpg" alt="Apartment in the Dark" /></a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a photo I took late last night that I wanted to share. It&#8217;s the living room in my apartment lit only by standby LEDs, power LEDs, and my persistence of vision clock. When I took the photo, all you could see with the naked eye were the lights, but given that this was a 4 minute exposure, the camera captured enough light to see the whole room.</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2330372480/Apartment+in+the+Dark.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2330372480/Apartment+in+the+Dark.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2253/2330372480_8b7c918f08.jpg" alt="Apartment in the Dark" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/11/19/in-the-dark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peggy&#8217;s Cove</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/10/31/peggys-cove/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/10/31/peggys-cove/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.geoffholden.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I spent this last weekend in Nova Scotia, as I was standing at a friend&#8217;s wedding. I did get a chance to take a few photos at Peggy&#8217;s Cove (which was less than a half hour away from where I was staying). One of these photos is below, and the rest are in <a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/album/72157603895039482/Scenic-Photos.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/album/72157603895039482/Scenic-Photos.html');">an album here</a>.</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2260253727/Peggy%27s+Cove+Lighthouse.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2260253727/Peggy%27s+Cove+Lighthouse.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2168/2260253727_da144bddc8.jpg" alt="Peggy's Cove Lighthouse" /></a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent this last weekend in Nova Scotia, as I was standing at a friend&#8217;s wedding. I did get a chance to take a few photos at Peggy&#8217;s Cove (which was less than a half hour away from where I was staying). One of these photos is below, and the rest are in <a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/album/72157603895039482/Scenic-Photos.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/album/72157603895039482/Scenic-Photos.html');">an album here</a>.</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2260253727/Peggy%27s+Cove+Lighthouse.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2260253727/Peggy%27s+Cove+Lighthouse.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2168/2260253727_da144bddc8.jpg" alt="Peggy's Cove Lighthouse" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/10/31/peggys-cove/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photo of the Week #52</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/10/21/photo-of-the-week-52/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/10/21/photo-of-the-week-52/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photo of the Week]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.geoffholden.com/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This weekend, I managed to get out Saturday morning before the rain started. I took the walk around Long Pond with the intent of capturing the fall colours. I came away with some exercise (it&#8217;s not a long walk, but I typically only go from the door to the car and vice versa) and four usable shots (<a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/album/72157603887755259/Photo-of-the-Week.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/album/72157603887755259/Photo-of-the-Week.html');">album here</a>).</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2256578640/Walking+Trail.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2256578640/Walking+Trail.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2163/2256578640_e0bf466114.jpg" alt="Walking Trail" /></a></p>
<p>This photo also marks the end of my &#8216;Photo of the Week&#8217; commitment. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weekend, I managed to get out Saturday morning before the rain started. I took the walk around Long Pond with the intent of capturing the fall colours. I came away with some exercise (it&#8217;s not a long walk, but I typically only go from the door to the car and vice versa) and four usable shots (<a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/album/72157603887755259/Photo-of-the-Week.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/album/72157603887755259/Photo-of-the-Week.html');">album here</a>).</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2256578640/Walking+Trail.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2256578640/Walking+Trail.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2163/2256578640_e0bf466114.jpg" alt="Walking Trail" /></a></p>
<p>This photo also marks the end of my &#8216;Photo of the Week&#8217; commitment. I&#8217;ve successfully pulled it off for a year now (admittedly, with a couple of cop-out posts), and I am pretty sure it has made me a better photographer; it&#8217;s somewhat interesting to go back and see my progression over the year. I still intend to post photos here pretty often, but it likely won&#8217;t be with the same regularity, and it won&#8217;t be with the &#8216;Photo of the Week&#8217; category&#8211;that&#8217;s retired as of this post. I also plan to actually start posting words here again (not sure when the first will be yet), so stay tuned for there are more things coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/10/21/photo-of-the-week-52/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photo of the Week #51</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/10/14/photo-of-the-week-51/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/10/14/photo-of-the-week-51/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photo of the Week]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.geoffholden.com/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t get out to take a photo this week, due partially to the less than inviting weather and also to my laziness. So this is a photo from a while ago, processed tonight.</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2256571162/Purple+Flower.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2256571162/Purple+Flower.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2105/2256571162_cea155e8e0.jpg" alt="Purple Flower" /></a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t get out to take a photo this week, due partially to the less than inviting weather and also to my laziness. So this is a photo from a while ago, processed tonight.</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2256571162/Purple+Flower.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2256571162/Purple+Flower.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2105/2256571162_cea155e8e0.jpg" alt="Purple Flower" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/10/14/photo-of-the-week-51/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photo of the Week #50</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/10/07/photo-of-the-week-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/10/07/photo-of-the-week-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photo of the Week]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.geoffholden.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s photo is of the Basilica in St. John&#8217;s. This one was taken just as it was getting dark, hence the deep blue sky.</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2256577570/Basilica.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2256577570/Basilica.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2226/2256577570_7467ae1108.jpg" alt="Basilica" /></a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s photo is of the Basilica in St. John&#8217;s. This one was taken just as it was getting dark, hence the deep blue sky.</p>
<p class="figure"><a href="http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2256577570/Basilica.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://gkhphoto.com/gallery/photo/2256577570/Basilica.html');"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2226/2256577570_7467ae1108.jpg" alt="Basilica" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geoffholden.com/2007/10/07/photo-of-the-week-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
